Friday, 19 February 2010

"Corporate Sales Responsibility"

I guess it is high time we did something to Save our Tigers. Aircel came out with its research and gave us a number – 1411. Got a cute cub, some celebrities and started an initiative. But, what about the impact of this advertisement?

We can see a lot of money has been pumped into the making of these advertisements. There is an effort put in the technical aspects of the making of the ad. The camera work was good enough. The background score was more than average and it beautifully blended into the Aircel theme.

But the question remains. Did it have an impact? I feel it did, but only to a small extent. We are all talking about it. The dwindling numbers of the tiger population is now somewhat clearer than what it was before Aircel took up this “initiative”.

But on the flip side. One can clearly notice that Aircel is trying to gain publicity. Be it the deliberate resemblance of the tiger stripes to the Aircel logo, or the subtle and smooth blend of the background music into the Aircel theme. With the low client numbers of Aircel and the fact that bringing Dhoni into their commercial ads didn’t boost their sales, one does smell a rat.

Another thing that the makers of this ad must realise is that mere “talking, blogging and sharing” may not help a lot in saving the tigers from extinction. The tightening must be done at the government and at the grass root level as well. Considering that these ads have been made in English, it won’t have a lasting impact as the real threat to tigers is in jungles bordering villages where English has little or no place in communication at all.

Although I do agree that the real market for “tiger-products” is urban areas, we need to thank Aircel for taking the initiative of reminding us of our dying friend. But has this reminder been sent out of genuine concern? I really doubt so. Just a piece of advice to Aircel in the words of B Ramalinga Raju. This "initiative" of gaining publicity is “like riding a (virtual) tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten.”

!dea's idea to save paper and use SMS and MMS was an instant hit. The ad was brilliant. The wit – amazing! The message – clear! The hidden agenda – obvious! I wonder how does the Aditya Birla Group function without using paper. Do they mail everything that they want to communicate? Or is their dependence on SMSs very high? Are contracts and other documents signed electronically? And cheques? Are they even used? I wonder if Kumar Mangalam Birla cycles to office everyday.

Let us not forget that the conglomerate has some business interests in the mining, cement and chemical sectors. All of which do have some negative fallouts on the environment. Does it want the general public to negate the damage it has caused on the environment through its business activities?

Although the sales of the cellular service provider grew approximately 32% (CAGR) over the last three years, Idea Cellular can still be considered a dwarf as compared to the others in this sector.

!dea has always been known for its splendid ads that fabulously blend logic and wit. “What an Idea Sirjee!” has found its place in daily communication. “Walk n Talk, Talk n Walk” became an anthem. AB’s Baby grew up and became !dea Sirjee!

The TV ads try to get us use the electronic mode of communication in order to save trees. The radio ads for saving trees and paper seem to be deliberate attempts to not only increase the sales, but also the revenue generated from sending SMSs and MMSs.

The latest ad in particular reminds me of a joke: Man is one such creature who cuts trees, makes paper and then writes on them SAVE PAPER!

Let me assume that not a single piece of paper was used in the ad. But what about the immense amount of fumes that the vanity vans and generator vans emitted into the atmosphere? These vans use up the diesel even when they are stationary. Were the techniques and equipments really eco-friendly?

To these companies: using social causes for boosting revenue is not a good idea, SirjeE!

3 comments:

  1. Its sad that issues like these are used for personal profit... I have seen people comment on the cub.. Oh, cho cute.. etc. but what is Aircel actually planning to go about it is not known.. How do we join them in their iniative, i still don't know.. though they keep re-iterating it in their advertisements.. Just by geting their product does not seem a really logical way to save tigers..

    Same goes for the Idea adverstisements... Stupid and unreal methods are shown to save paper.. It is more than enough that these companies come up with logical solutions at least in their advertisements so that people can actually be steered into the direction of thinking clearly..

    At least, the new Hippo advertisement is aiming at peace in an entertaining way to spread their message.(I may seem biased because it is a personal favourite.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes I do agree with all of the above points, but id like to have a little optimistic view of the ad campaigns as well. It cannot be ignored that these ads are definitely increasing a lot of awareness among the public about various environmental issues. A radical change cannot be expected at this moment but working towards it has already begun. I feel that the companies should take advantage of this publicity that they have gained and go one step further. They can ask for monetary and other kinds of support from the public towards these causes. For e.g. they may provide the audience with a contact detail through which volunteers can be contacted to practically work for the benefit of the environment, road shows can be made, financial support can be gathered etc. Thus, the companies get to cash on their corporate sales responsibility and at the same time, benefit the society as a whole.

    ReplyDelete
  3. post is TOOO long...PLZZ trim it...make it a li'l curt!

    ReplyDelete